Thought of the day

    A saying I gleaned from a novel a while back, Called 'YNK' stands for 'You never know.' It became my catch phrase for things I might be able to grasp, but never explain fully. "Is there a Loch Ness? YNK" or, "Is the bible totally factual? YNK" I started using it among friends when ever we were discussing topics online. Entire side discussions could be avoided by just saying 'YNK' with understanding on both sides that no ground could really be taken further on the issue. I've used this saying mostly on the net, because generally there's no way to prove what's on there is factual or not.
    Funny that, eh? Interestingly "There is no way to prove or disprove any claim on the internet." I'm sure you've all heard the saying 'talk is cheap.' Well, text is damn near free. No matter what you read, what you might see, or what someone else tells you over the net, 99.9% of the time you believe the information is correct based upon a faith that the person uploading the information on the other side is doing so factually or not. I don't say truthfully, because one man's truth can be another man's fiction, so I'll stick with facts here.
    There's the short story of the black and white crow. An individual makes a statement "All crows are black." Both the person and any listeners who choose to believe or disbelieve this statement, do so on faith. Because it would be exceedingly difficult to catalogue every crow on the planet and verify that they are all indeed black. Based on personal observation of every crow the person might have seen through their life, they'll be able to say with high probability that every crow is indeed black, and the listeners might do so as well. But factually, there must be an allowance for the possibility of a white crow.
    On this very page, I've made some grandiose claims regarding my personal life. Those who have read it have made their own opinions whether it's true or not, based on their own personal opinion. But, like the crow, the real test is whether or not the reader will allow for the possibility of the white crow. I myself still do this, despite writing in a fashion which suggests the acceptance of personal truth, I maintain that I might be wrong, and there's the white crow out there which I've just not seen yet.

    You might be thinking to yourself now "But that's just the internet, sure everything there's virtual and there's the chance for fiction, but not in real life. We can see and touch things, we know if it's true or not." Do you really?
    I just finished reading an article involving a real-estate fraud happening in Sydney. 50 or so people every month are taken advantage of in scams which see them loosing incredibly large sums of money. Tens of thousands, hundreds of thousands. Interesting how they're interacting in 'real life' and yet can't tell if what they're doing is real or fictional. Not just anyone either; impressionable children or net savvy users. Real venture capitol investors, the kind of people who are very careful with how they spend their money. Are you so sure now that what you're seeing in real life is 'real?'
    What about what the news media spins off? I can't help but think about the latest fiasco involving the Bush Administration and 'WMD's'. At the time, every government official, and news agency was saying the same thing, that there were in fact these weapons, that they might end up in the hands of Al Qaeda, and generally Saddam was 'a very bad man, so we should go invade his country.' Don't get me wrong; I'm all for the downfall of persecuting dictatorships, but as it's been discovered recently, lying to an entire country to accomplish the task hits me as a little shady.

    This brings me into one of the first items I would like to comment on about a perspective government lying to its public. We're all familiar with what occurred on 9/11, and the events that took place afterward. What some do not know is a Boeing 757 never struck the Pentagon. I'd like to say that again, incase you didn't quite catch it.

    A Boeing 757 Never Impacted The Pentagon.

    I'd like to clear some facts. The following applies to all 757's in United Airlines inventory (American airlines should be very similar.)

    -   Operating Empty Weight: (No fuel, cargo, passengers) 135,100 lbs
    -   Usable Fuel Load: 75,400 lbs
    -   Max Take Off Gross Weight: 230,000 lbs
    -   Length: 155'3"
    -   Wingspan: 124'10"
    -   Height: (belly to top of rudder) 44'3"

    Now with those figures under our belt, let's do some checking. The flight in question wasn't fully fueled. Jet fuel weighs 6.7 lbs per gallon, and that particular flight was fueled with 5,300 gallons, making it 35,510 lbs of fuel. That's just shy of 18 tons. The aircraft itself, which in an empty capacity weighs 135,000 lbs. (67 tons) This of course is not including any passengers, luggage, or cargo, which could be upwards to an additional 10 tons. Providing for time in flight, which would have eaten roughly 3 tons of fuel, I calculate the aircraft weight at 92 tons.
    Next, I would like to consider the aircraft dimensions. Wingtip to wingtip, the aircraft is close to 125 feet long, from the belly to the tail, 44 feet. (The engine nacelles hang 5'5" below the belly of the aircraft, which are also about 21'3" feet away from the aircraft centerline mounted on the wings.) So, with some quick math, the aircraft has about 657 square feet of frontal bulk. Remember that folks, 657 square feet.

    Some facts about the crash; the NTSB says the aircraft plowed into the Pentagon at 530mph, at 2 feet above the ground, flying in at 250 degrees from WSW.
    ASCE says the top of the aircraft was no more then 20 feet above the ground. Additionally, there was 10 inches of solid material, either limestone or concrete, which the aircraft would have had to penetrate before actually entering the building.

    The NTSB continues on to say the aircraft was flying 2 feet above the ground. This is possible and verifiable. Under the nose of the aircraft, a receiver and transmitter for what's called the 'RadAlt' are located. This device is a second indication of the aircraft's altitude. It's independent of the Barometric indicating system, and at lower altitudes, more accurate. The problem with the aircraft being 2 feet above the ground are the engine nacelles which hang 5'5" below the belly of the aircraft, an additional 3.5 feet remain unaccounted for. They would have left huge troughs of disturbed soil before the impact. This would have forced the nacelles to depart the wings, and decelerate very quickly, impacting the outer wall of the pentagon with much less force; remaining largely intact. Second, large aircraft flying at high speeds leave incredible wake vortices (turbulence) in their path. So much so, it's vital that no two aircraft pass within 5 miles of each other's path. This turbulence is so vigorous, it can and has ripped the wings off smaller aircraft. Interestingly enough, the 757 passed scant feet over the Washington blvd, Columbia Pike interchange just before striking the Pentagon. At the time, there was a major traffic jam in this interchange. Not one car was disturbed.
    The aircraft had close to 16 tons of fuel still on board. This fuel is spread throughout the entire structure of the wings, and a large center tank between the two. The popular school of thought is the reason for the almost pristine conditions at the pentagon, just after the impact and afterward after the impact, was the aircraft's fuel load was carried inside the building, to burn there.
    No, not even possible
    The reason for all the construction equipment around the area of the impact, Wedge 1 was just being completed on a many year renovation and strengthening. Including a hardened and beefier outer wall, specifically designed to withstand missile attacks, and small aircraft. I can imagine the center tank making it into the building, as it had almost 60 feet of fuselage preceding it to clear the way. The wings however would have initially impacted the outside of the building, and released most of the fuel there. Creating an immense explosion and consequent fire, this would have engulfed the entire side of the building in flame.
    Many months after the attack, Purdue University decided to flex their academic muscle and completely simulate the impact of the aircraft. I've seen the movies and renderings myself, and they're very well done. However, what they forget to include is this outer wall again. I simply do not understand how this very crucial piece of structure is being overlooked, and why no one really questioned as to why there was so little fire damage to the exterior of the building/grounds.
    Referencing the image to the right, you'll note that there is very little flame or burning besides the very center portion of the impact which shows any burning. Not to mention the almost total lack of any black smoke. Jet fuel is basically a very high-grade diesel. Diesel fuel in an uncontrolled burn, creates large amounts of dense black smoke. The only smoke in this image showing a diesel burn is off to the right, where a large diesel generator was sitting. Nowhere else however is there any evidence of this kind of combustion.
    The Pentagon is 78 feet tall. The total height of a 757 with gear up is 44 feet. Recall before how I mentioned the frontal area of a 757 is roughly 657 square feet. One has to wonder just how so much of the building survived, not to mention the intact windows, after a 757 hit them. Especially the windows just above the fuselage entry point. The tail should have impacted, fragmented and taken out every window in this area with out question. Also, if you would note - in one of these renderings the aircraft has been placed at the correct roll angle to coincide with the outside building damage, the #2 engine is plowing a nice trough through the front lawn, yet there is no evidence of this at all in actual photos taken on the scene.
    Additionally let's not forget that in almost every large aircraft disaster, no matter what the aircraft has hit, the tail section which includes the rudder, elevators and empennage always survive in some way or form. The reason for this is that after the nose of the aircraft hits whatever a solid object, deceleration begins to happen. By the time the tail is reached, large enough portions typically break off so much so an onlooker could easily recognize them. I would also like to point out that in a 757, the DFDR (Digital Flight Data Recorder) or 'black box' is located above the cabin, very close to the tail of these airplanes. The additional reason being again the tail having the highest likelihood of survival. Interestingly, the DFDR was found at the very end of the damage, in C ring close to 'the hole in the wall.' This again doesn't follow through. The DFDR would have been at the height of the second floor, somehow making it all the way through three sections of the pentagon, down from the second floor to the first, and yet was still recognizable enough to be found? I will grant that DFDR's are manufactured in such a way that they will survive some horrendous conditions, but in this case I highly doubt it would have survived.
    This brings me to the damage done to the pentagons structure itself. There are some large inconsistencies to the pattern of damage. First is 'the hole in the wall.' If you reference the image on the left, you'll note that a large amount of columns which are described to have "Cracking and spalling, but no significant impairment in function." Just before an almost perfect hole in the inner C ring wall. Additionally, about midway through the building there's a portion of second floor deflected upward, midway through the impact damage. Frankly these characteristics sound more to me like a multi-warhead cruise missile hit. Second are the engines for a 757. RB-211's which weigh in close 5.5 tons a piece, sit a little over 21 feet from the center of the aircraft. There should be some 'paths of damage' for both of these pieces of the aircraft plowing through the building, but there's little to be seen.
    Reguarding some other issues involving the aircraft and the structure. The highest massing pieces of aircraft would be the engines, specifically the fan disks, the 10 wheel hubs, about 8 or so tungsten counterweights used to prevent flutter in the ailerons, flaps and tail control surfaces, and lastly the nose and main landing gear. Most of these items are either massive, or incredibly dense. It's understandable that much of the aircraft's aluminum structure was totally disintegrated in the impact, the larger structures however should have survived and been readily found & identified. To date many of these items are still 'missing.' One such item in question is the aircraft's engines. A turbine engine the size of a RB-211 is an almost unimaginably massive thing. Picture about five to six hundred 350 V-8's together and you might equal the horsepower output of this single engine. Lets not forget the solid titanium fan disk which weighs close to a ton. Of course the thousands of compressor and turbine blades, made out of incredibly strong nickel-iron. All bolted together into a very tight package that has been known to survive some incredible conditions. Only small pieces of these engines were found. A single stage of the exhaust turbine, and somewhat recognizable portion of a turbine outer casing.
    I'd like to pull away here for a moment and make a comment about that outer casing. It's not made of very strong materials comparatively to what it houses. The exhaust blade stages, main bearings, central torque shaft… on and on. What that casing is, is a final cover for the exhaust section of the engine. How did such an item survive to the point of identification, and not the robust components inside? To put this into an analogy, imagine a rock covered in construction paper with which you've written a short story on. Now, after a horrific accident (wrap it in dynamite, and throw it against a wall at about 300mph) most of the rock is gone, only small barely recognizable pieces remain. However, enough of the construction paper remains to make out what the story is. Does that make any sense to you? This is basically the result of the evidence presented with that turbine case.
    I will account for some readily recognizable items in the debris from the impact, however, the destructive energy it would have taken to remove the turbine blade disk from the engine (officially I would say this is a N2 turbine disk) would have also ripped the disk into multiple pieces.
    Two final mentions about the aircraft structure and the building. Aluminum, melts at 1,220° F, It boils at 4,472° F. The ASCE report states that the maximum temperature which was reached inside the building; "…the maximum temperature at these locations might also have reached 1,740°F (950°C)" This allows for melting most if not all of the aircraft structure, but doesn't allow for any vaporization. There should be massive pools of melted aluminum inside the building. Nevertheless, there are none.
    Second, deceleration rates. When any item impacts another, both undergo deceleration stresses. This is where one part keeps going the same velocity it was, while another changes. These conditions become unbelievably chaotic and unpredictable the more complex the structure becomes, the harder it is to predict. This is why car manufacturers still destructively test their cars today vs. with a computer model. However, there are some rough assumptions which still can be made in regards to what would happen if a large aircraft impacted a hardened building such as the pentagon. I'll try to take this step by step.
    - The turbulence generated by the aircraft's velocity, overturn cars and cause large amounts of shattered windows/mirrors/glass in the cars on the interchange just proceeding the building, additionally ripping up huge tracts of sod just prior to the building's outer wall.
    - The nose first impacts the building, a shockwave begins to travel down the length of the fuselage. The building also experiences the same characteristics, except the shockwave travels out radially from the wall, and through the substructure underneath
    - The shockwave through the fuselage just proceeds the crushing damage, super stressing all joints and instantly shearing fasteners. This in effect almost acts as a pre-digestion before impacting the more solid portions of the concrete wall, most of the aluminum is either rendered into fine powder or granules a few millimeters in thickness. Any other materials are also undergoing the same destruction. Only the more solid materials such as the nose landing gear will overstress the wall punch holes through the outer wall.
    - Finally reaching the first quarter of the cabin, much of the outer wall has been totally decimated and the aircraft is now penetrating the inner portions of the pentagon. The reaction between the outer wall and the pentagon has caused the fuselage to decelerate sharply, catastrophically stressing the wing joint roots. If the engines have not departed the wings at this point from ground strike, then the wings and engines are now traveling faster then the fuselage, causing them to flex forward drastically.
    - The mid cabin has now passed through where the outer wall was previously. Enough deceleration has taken place so exceptionally large chunks of fuselage are being ripped and thrown clear, ricocheting off the building or being carried along inside. The wing roots are also contacting the wall, and because of the severe stressing previously caused by the fuselage deceleration, the wings shear almost perfectly from the fuselage and impact the walls at the same speed the nose previously did. Causing the initial leading edge of the wing to almost vaporize. The fuselage center-tank is also just now entering the building, Because of the path cleared by the previous half of the fuselage, the tank should not release most of its contents until it's entered the building a little further and contacts more solid portions. Upon contact, the fuel will be dispersed and explode.
    - Three quarters of the cabin have now passed into the pentagon. Enough deceleration has taken place to allow for exceptionally large pieces of the airframe to remain intact, the very bottom of the rudder root should now be entering the building. As per aircraft design, this might break what's left of the fuselage from the empennage. (tail section) The wings should have by now totally destroyed themselves against the sides of the building, releasing 3/4's of the aircraft's fuel load external to the building. Because of the tremendous friction and heat, instantaneous ignition will occur resulting in an explosion and large amount of fire and black smoke. At this point it's difficult to say just what would happen to the engines, whether they will totally destroy themselves against previously untouched wall, or continue on in a very large chunk further on into the building. Suffice to say, there should be considerable paths of damage corresponding to the velocity of the engines.
    - The aircraft has now totally entered the building. The tail of the aircraft has undergone enough deceleration that most of it's contents should remain in the E ring, if possibly the D ring. Such items include the large hydraulic servo mechanisms, APU, DFDR, Counterweights and large built up portions of structure.

    I realize my estimate of what might have happened would be largely faulted for a lack of understanding high energy/velocity physics, but there are some basics I believe I'm right about. The real issue here is to recognize that the damage simply does not fit the explanation given to us.
    If I was to make a guess about what happened, I would estimate a much smaller aircraft, say an Ember air 145, or a BAE 146 was used. The aircraft was loaded with select parts from a 757, perhaps some additional explosives, and then remotely flown in. This solution also does not account for some other minor discrepancies, but in my mind fits with the amount of damage, and consequent evidence thereafter. Or, to further the conspiracy, a cruise missile was used and the 757 parts were already planted in the building at the start. Honestly the possibilities form a path which widens from the start, to an almost infinite width the further away you go.

    After all the reasoning, all the facts, all the interpretation, it all comes down to what you're going to believe. In the end, I choose to believe it was something other then a 757. Of course, now the real question is; if AA flight 77 never hit the building, then where did it go?

    While doing all the research for this last piece, I came across some other interesting information in relation to the other accidents. Mind you - perhaps it's a case of people wanting there to be something more then what's been presented but the information certainly is interesting.
    Fact about the world trade center collapse. Columbia University's Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory in Palisades, N.Y., 21 miles north of the WTC, Recorded some strange seismic readings just prior to the towers collapse. To set up a comparison, the Palisades seismographs register underground explosions from a quarry 20 miles away. These blasts are caused by 80,000 pounds of ammonium nitrate and cause local earthquakes between Magnitude 1 and 2.
    The initial aircraft impacts caused minimal shaking, well under .5 on the Richter scale. The Palisades units recorded a 2.1 magnitude earthquake during the 10-second collapse of the South Tower at 9:59:04 and a 2.3 quake during the 8-second collapse of the North Tower at 10:28:31. This again in itself is not unusual. What is unusual are the two unexplained seismic spikes just preceding both the towers perspective collapses barely a second before the buildings structure failed. These spikes measured over 20 times the intensity of the buildings actual fall.
    Lastly, regarding WTC1/2. In the subbasements of both buildings, where the 47 support columns embedded directly into bedrock are located, hotspots of literal 'molten steel' were discovered a month after the collapse. These subbasements are located 70 feet below ground level, in a very oxygen poor area. To keep some facts in mind, Structural steel melts at 2700°F. That's quite a temperature to maintain, especially 4 weeks after all the dust has cleared and debris settled. Jet fuel, paper, and other combustibles normally found in an office environment, burning in an uncontrolled open-air burn, will only reach a temperature of 1,520°F. That's a far cry from the melting point of steel.
    So, to wrap up, we have unexplained super seismic spikes seconds before each tower collapse, and incredible temperatures found in the subbasements a full month after. Can anyone say nuclear intervention?

    Of course, then there's the very little known, and under publicized WTC7. Were you aware that that building #7 collapsed at 5:22 p.m, 6 hours after WTC1&2? Here's some facts about building 7. WTC7 was located a full block away from WTC1, and had all of WTC6 in front of it, in all 355 feet away from the north tower. The building collapsed in what engineers call 'A controlled implosion.' This means that when the building collapses, it does so in an inward fall. The building collapses in a uniform manor, so at the end, you're left with a nice rubble pile which takes up no more room then the original footprint of the building. Accomplishing this is an incredibly difficult and complex task, requiring multiple explosives, critical timings and precision placement. The manner in which the building collapsed clearly shows nothing other then a controlled fall. What I'm basically saying here, is any uncontrolled building collapse, would be chaotic, unpredictable, and end with a great deal of collateral damage to other buildings. Yet, when the dust had cleared, WTC7 was now a neat 2 story pile of rubble, comprising no more space then the original building footprint, and zero collateral damage to other surrounding buildings.
    The video which I've provided, shows the entire building, from start to finish - fall in a very controlled and uniform manor. This is not a catastrophic failure folks, this is a controlled demolition.
    Steel structure buildings are designed in such a way that they will never fail in the event of a fire. The superstructures are over-engineered to handle several times the maximum loads anticipated during their lifetimes; hurricanes, earthquakes, fires on multiple floors, destruction and stresses unimaginable. They are specifically designed to handle all these events and more. Just for example, in 1998 the First interstate bank building in Los Angles underwent a multiple floor fire for 3 and a half hours. The fire consumed four floors of the 64-floor building, and yet despite the obvious severity of the fire, the building did not collapse. Then in 1991, at One Meridian Plaza in Philadelphia, an uncontrolled fire raged for over 17 hours, consuming eight floors of the 38-floor building. The fire caused window breakage, cracking of granite, and failures of spandrel panel connections. Despite the severity and duration of the fire, as evidenced by the damaged the building sustained, no part of the building collapsed. Both of these fires were far more severe then what was witnessed at WTC7 and yet both buildings survived, and are still standing long after the fires had occurred. (The building at 1 meridian Plaza was dismantled in 1999) In fact, the official report after the Los Angles fire stated; "In spite of the total burnout of four and a half floors, from the 12th to the 16th, there was no damage to the main structural members and only minor damage to one secondary beam and a small number of floor pans."
     The official story being released as to just why WTC7 Collapsed states the fuel tanks which provide fuel oil to the six 1,200kw generators on the premises, had developed leaks in the fuel lines due to fallout from the north tower collapse; causing a fire, and damaging critical structural members in the building allowing for the catastrophic collapse.
    Here's a more sarcastic view of what happened.
    1. Unfortunately, debris from the collapse of the north tower (the closest tower) fell across the building known as World Trade Center Six, and then across Vesey Street, and then impacted WTC 7 which is (at closest) 355 feet away from the north tower.
    2. Unfortunately, some of this debris penetrated the outer wall of WTC 7, smashed half way through the building, demolishing a concrete masonry wall (in the north half of the building) and then breached a fuel oil pipe that ran across the building just to the north of the masonry wall.
    3. Unfortunately, though most of the falling debris was cold, it manages to start numerous fires in WTC 7. (Diesel must be at 60°c before ignition is possible)
    4. Unfortunately, even with the outbreak of numerous fires in the building, no decision was made to turn off the generators now supplying electricity to WTC 7. Fortunately, for the firefighters, someone did make the decision not to fight and contain the fires while they were still small, but to wait until the fires were large and out of control. Otherwise, many firefighters may have been electrocuted while fighting the fires.
    5. Unfortunately, the safety mechanism that should have shut down the fuel oil pumps (which were powered by electricity) upon the breaching of the fuel line, failed to work and fuel oil (diesel) was pumped from the Salomon Smith Barney tanks on the ground floor onto the 5th floor where it ignited. The pumps eventually emptied the tanks, pumping some 12,000 gallons in all.
    6. Unfortunately, the sprinkler system of WTC 7 malfunctioned and did not extinguish the fires.
    7. Unfortunately, the burning diesel heated trusses one and two to the point that they lost their structural integrity.
    8. Unfortunately, this then (somehow) caused the whole building to collapse, even though before September 11, no steel framed skyscraper had ever collapsed due to fire.

    If that's not suspect enough, here's some more food for thought. WTC7 housed the Office of Emergency Management on the 23'rd floor. This entire floor had received 15 million dollars in renovation including independent and secure air and water supplies, bullet and bomb resistant windows designed to withstand 200 MPH winds. The 1993 bombing was the rational for this upgrade, as this command center overlooked WTC1 & 2, both being prime terrorist targets.
    It's very interesting to note that the day of the attack, Mayor Giuliani and entourage decided to set up shop in a completely different building, despite WTC7's 23'rd floor having been designed for just this exact eventuality, and at the time, WTC7 was completely untouched and in a sound condition.

    As a last mention, considering up until this time no steel structured building had ever failed due to a fire, nor had there ever been a case of large aircraft impact and subsequent collapse. One would think that hundreds of specialists and engineers would be pouring over the rubble of the buildings to examine the remains so they could investigate and perhaps discover the critical flaws inherent in the designs so that future buildings could be designed better. Additionally concerning WTC7, and how no steel structured building had ever collapsed due to a fire, you would think they would be doubly motivated to discover the exact and unquestioning cause as to why the building failed. Considering there are so many other buildings about which are built on the same engineering principles. With these considerations to keep in mind, is it any surprise to learn that 99.9% of all the structural steel from all three buildings was immediately shipped off to foreign buyers at scrap value, to be melted down?
    Investigators were never allowed to do any live or onsite investigations of the rubble at ground zero and the cleanup processes were closely guarded by the US military. Only select pieces spray-painted 'SAVE' were left behind at the 'Fresh Kills landfill,' the designated transfer location for all the steel recovered from all three buildings.

That's right folks, the most catastrophic engineering failure in the history of human kind, and yet no formal or thorough investigation was allowed or performed. I'm not even going to bother hypothesizing the reason; I'll let you think it over.

    All the information I've presented here was gathered over a period of about a month; a few hundred websites and many a late night reading, checking one fact after another. Honestly, a good deal of this information could be suspect, I could be wrong in my assumptions, but there are just too many unanswered questions. I would like to leave you all with something to think about. The American people do not act; they react. Whether it be for good or bad, the society is a lazy one and will not move unless poked with a cattle prod. The Bush family has an abundant supply of questionable contacts throughout corporate America, and the Middle East. This of course does not even allow for the Whitehouse higher staff, and the goings on there. Quite frankly, I believe much of what happened on 9/11 was scripted simply to make the American people outraged to play into whatever plan the GOP had in mind. All that was necessary after was to guide that anger towards the end goal. The question now is just what is that end goal?

    Before I leave this entry, I would like to make a prediction. Call me crazy, but I've been prompted to do this by the words of a friend. November 25th (Which is tomorrow for those in the states), something groundbreaking will happen. It will be something dramatic, it will receive massive news coverage, and it will once again galvanize the American people. Other then that, I can't be too sure what it is, but we'll just have to see.

Here's some documents and resources I used while compiling this text. By no means decisive or complete, as there were hundreds of other webpages and other files which are many hundreds of mb in size which I'll not mirror here. But perhaps these might spur you on to do some digging of your own.

    If you've made it this far, there's a flash document which I discovered while doing the research for this piece. I'm not one for sensationalism, or flashiness, but the message it provides and the manner in which it does it - certainly helps my theory. They illustrate a good deal of issues involving the Pentagon strike which can only be done in pictures and motion.
Pentagon video, from http://www.pentagonstrike.co.uk/

Comment on this Entry in Live Journal